Skip to content
Advances in Decision Sciences (ADS)

Advances in Decision Sciences (ADS)

Published by Scientific and Business World, Singapore

  • About This Journal
    • Aim and Scope
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Workflow
    • Publication Ethics
    • Paper Submission
    • Manuscript Format
    • Manuscript FAQ
    • Subscription Information
  • Editors Menu
    • Editors’ Roles and Responsibilities
    • Handling a Manuscript
    • Peer Review at ADS
    • English Editing
  • Special Issues
    • About Special Issues
    • Editorial Board Special Issues
    • Preparing a Call for Papers
    • Promoting a Call for Papers
    • Special Invitation
    • Special Issues FAQ
    • Published Special Issues
  • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents for Year 2025
    • Table of Contents for Year 2024
    • Table of Contents for Year 2023
    • Table of Contents for Year 2022
    • Table of Contents for Year 2021
    • Table of Contents for Year 2020
    • Table of Contents for Year 2019
    • Table of Contents for Year 2018
    • Archive Contents for Year 1997 to 2017
      • Table of Contents for Year 2017
      • Table of Contents for Year 2016
      • Table of Contents for Year 2015
      • Table of Contents for Year 2014
      • Table of Contents for Year 2013
      • Table of Contents for Year 2012
      • Table of Contents for Year 2011
      • Table of Contents for Year 2010
      • Table of Contents for Year 2009
      • Table of Contents for Year 2008
      • Table of Contents for Year 2007
      • Table of Contents for Year 2006
      • Table of Contents for Year 2005
      • Table of Contents for Year 2004
      • Table of Contents for Year 2003
      • Table of Contents for Year 2002
      • Table of Contents for Year 2001
      • Table of Contents for Year 2000
      • Table of Contents for Year 1999
      • Table of Contents for Year 1998
      • Table of Contents for Year 1997
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Study of Investor Behavior on Stock Investment Decision Making with Self-Monitoring as a Moderating Variable in Generation Y and Generation Z

Study of Investor Behavior on Stock Investment Decision Making with Self-Monitoring as a Moderating Variable in Generation Y and Generation Z

Title

Study of Investor Behavior on Stock Investment Decision Making with Self-Monitoring as a Moderating Variable in Generation Y and Generation Z

Authors

  • Eni Duwita Sigalingging
    Department of Accounting, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Faculty of Economics and Business, Medan
  • Azhar Maksum
    Department of Accounting, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Faculty of Economics and Business, Medan, Indonesia
  • Rina Bukit
    Department of Accounting, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Faculty of Economics and Business, Medan, Indonesia
  • Muammar Khaddaf
    Departement of Sharia Accounting and Finance Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Malikussaleh Aceh, Indonesia

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the influence of psychological biases (trait anger, trait anxiety, overconfidence, and herding) on stock investment decisions among Generation Y and Z investors in North Sumatra. It uniquely investigates the role of self-monitoring as a moderating variable to determine if high self-regulation can mitigate irrational investment behaviors.
Design/methodology/approach: This research employs a quantitative approach, utilizing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze data from 384 retail investors. Additionally, an independent sample t-test is conducted to identify generational differences in decision-making patterns.
Findings: The results indicate that trait anger and anxiety negatively affect investment decisions, while herding and self-monitoring have a positive influence. Crucially, self-monitoring significantly moderates the relationship between trait anger and herding behavior on investment decisions. Generation Z is found to be more risk-tolerant and technology-driven, whereas Generation Y is more cautious and analytical.
Practical Implications: The findings suggest that financial literacy programs for young investors should go beyond technical analysis to include psychological conditioning. Regulators and investment managers can utilize these insights to design “cooling-off” mechanisms in trading apps or educational modules that enhance self-monitoring skills, thereby reducing impulsive trading.
Originality/Value: Unlike previous studies that solely focus on the direct effects of behavioral biases, this study bridges a theoretical gap by introducing self-monitoring as a psychological buffer. It provides a novel behavioral model for emerging markets, demonstrating how self-regulation can dampen the adverse effects of herding and emotional instability.

Keywords

Investment Decision, Generation Y, Generation Z, Self-Monitoring, Trait Anger

Classification-JEL

K16, H11, H83, D73

Pages

222-255

How to Cite

Sigalingging, E. D., Maksum, A., Bukit, R., & Khaddaf, M. (2026). Study of Investor Behavior on Stock Investment Decision Making with Self-Monitoring as a Moderating Variable in Generation Y and Generation Z. Advances in Decision Sciences, 29(3), 222-255.

https://doi.org/10.47654/v29y2025i3p222-255

Post navigation

Previous PostStudy of Investor Behavior on Stock Investment Decision Making with Self-Monitoring as a Moderating Variable in Generation Y and Generation Z

Submit Paper

Register / Submit




Special Issue Information

About Special Issues

Categories

ISSN 2090-3359 (Print)
ISSN 2090-3367 (Online)

Scientific and Business World

Asia University, Taiwan

8.3
2024CiteScore
 
88th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Q2 in Scopus
CiteScore 2024 = 8.3
CiteScoreTracker 2025 = 8.2
SNIP 2024 = 0.632
SJR Quartile = Q1
SJR 2024 = 0.814
H-Index = 18

Flag Counter
Since July 28, 2021

Powered by Headline WordPress Theme
Go to mobile version