Skip to content
Advances in Decision Sciences (ADS)

Advances in Decision Sciences (ADS)

Published by Asia University, Taiwan; Scientific and Business World

  • About This Journal
    • Aim and Scope
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Workflow
    • Publication Ethics
    • Paper Submission
    • Manuscript Format
    • Manuscript FAQ
    • Subscription Information
  • Editors Menu
    • Editors’ Roles and Responsibilities
    • Handling a Manuscript
    • Peer Review at ADS@AU
    • English Editing
  • Special Issues
    • About Special Issues
    • Editorial Board Special Issues
    • Preparing a Call for Papers
    • Promoting a Call for Papers
    • Special Invitation
    • Special Issues FAQ
    • Published Special Issues
  • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents for Year 2024
    • Table of Contents for Year 2023
    • Table of Contents for Year 2022
    • Table of Contents for Year 2021
    • Table of Contents for Year 2020
    • Table of Contents for Year 2019
    • Table of Contents for Year 2018
    • Archive Contents for Year 1997 to 2017
      • Table of Contents for Year 2017
      • Table of Contents for Year 2016
      • Table of Contents for Year 2015
      • Table of Contents for Year 2014
      • Table of Contents for Year 2013
      • Table of Contents for Year 2012
      • Table of Contents for Year 2011
      • Table of Contents for Year 2010
      • Table of Contents for Year 2009
      • Table of Contents for Year 2008
      • Table of Contents for Year 2007
      • Table of Contents for Year 2006
      • Table of Contents for Year 2005
      • Table of Contents for Year 2004
      • Table of Contents for Year 2003
      • Table of Contents for Year 2002
      • Table of Contents for Year 2001
      • Table of Contents for Year 2000
      • Table of Contents for Year 1999
      • Table of Contents for Year 1998
      • Table of Contents for Year 1997
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Extension of Classical TOPSIS Method Using Q-Rung Orthopair Triangular Fuzzy Number

Extension of Classical TOPSIS Method Using Q-Rung Orthopair Triangular Fuzzy Number

Title

Extension of Classical TOPSIS Method Using Q-Rung Orthopair Triangular Fuzzy Number

Authors

  • Meltem Yontar Aksoy
    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Management, Istanbul, Turkey)
  • Ayşe Nur Karabayır
    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Passau, Passau, Germany)
  • Zahide Özden Ceylan Güngör
    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Management, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

Purpose:As an extension of pythagorean fuzzy sets, the q‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q‐ROFS) is proposed by Yager in 2017. The q-ROFS offers a novel calculation form for the loss function and effectively deals with unclear information of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems. The concept of q-rung orthopair fuzzy number (q-ROFN) is introduced to facilitate the use of q-ROFS in 2018. This study proposes a comprehensive q‐rung orthopair triangular fuzzy number (q-ROTFN) which is a special notation of q-ROFN, to cope with supplier selection problems. Design/methodology/approach:A new method is developed in this paper for supplier selection MADM problems in uncertain situations. The proposed technique utilizes experts’ knowledge represented by q‐ROFN. It considers the selection of the most proper supplier taking into account flexibility, quality, price, supplier profile, and delivery criteria. Based on the advantages of q-ROFN, this article proposes an extended fuzzy TOPSIS method that does not require aggregation technology. Findings:To verify the proposed technique, a case study is conducted to evaluate and rank the alternative suppliers for an automotive company. As a result of the outcomes, it is shown that the proposed method is suitable for MADM problems. Originality/value:The main contributions of this paper are as follows:(i) Traditional TOPSIS method has been extended using the q-ROTFN to solve multi-attribute decision problems, (ii) It is shown that aggregation techniques are not needed for q-ROTFN based TOPSIS method, (iii) A novel expert weight calculation technique is proposed.

Keywords

Q-Rung orthopair fuzzy number, TOPSIS, supplier selection, multiple attribute decision-making

Classification-JEL

D7, D81

Pages

163-187

https://doi.org/10.47654/v26y2022i1p163-187

Post navigation

Previous PostExtension of Classical TOPSIS Method Using Q-Rung Orthopair Triangular Fuzzy Number

Submit Paper

Register / Submit




Special Issue Information

About Special Issues

Categories

ISSN 2090-3359 (Print)
ISSN 2090-3367 (Online)

Asia University, Taiwan

Scientific and Business World

4.7
2023CiteScore
 
86th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Q2 in Scopus
CiteScore 2023 = 4.7
CiteScoreTracker 2024 = 8.5
SNIP 2023 = 0.799
SJR Quartile = Q1
SJR 2024 = 0.814
H-Index = 20

Flag Counter
Since July 28, 2021

Powered by Headline WordPress Theme
Go to mobile version